Architecture Review Board Charge and Membership

Charge: 

  • Addresses information technology architecture issues and provides policy, standards, guidelines, or procedural recommendations to the IT Executive Steering Committee (ITESC)
  • Initiates and recommends specifications for district-wide  Information Technology Architecture specifications
  • Reviews proposed programs and projects and makes recommendations regarding their compliance with technical architecture standards
  • Review exception requests to technical architecture standards and make recommendations to IT Executive Steering Committee (ITESC)
  • Review Proposed changes to the architecture, reviewing IT trends, strategies and activities and make recommendations to IT Executive Steering Committee (ITESC)
  • Review and make recommendations to the IT Executive Steering Committee (ITESC) on IT risk management, regulatory compliance and business continuity

IT actions requiring ARB review and approval include any plan, implementation, or production change that is outside the currently approved IT Architecture, including:

  • New IT products requested or intended for purchase
  • Products to be tested for probable use in the production environment that would move to the “Candidate” category
  • Products proposed for moving from “Candidate” to “Supported” or “Preferred”
  • Decommissioning of supported or preferred technologies
  • Projects creating new systems
  • Projects integrating one or more previously identified “enterprise” services or systems.
  • Will cause a significant modification to an existing IT system, application, or service

Members:

  • Chair: Director of Computer Services – Gary Schieber
  • From Audit:
    • Computer Services Manager
      • Since we do not have this right now I would propose the following
        • Network Representative – Jennifer Swafford
        • Server Representative – Doug Fox
        • DBA Representative – Kevin Burke
    • Project Manager – Melissa Marr
    • Application Manager
      • Since we do not have this right now I would propose the following
        • PeopleSoft Development – Melinda Sportsman
        • Application Development – Quentin Ochieng
    • End User Services Manager
      • Since we do not have this right now I would propose the following
        • Larry Lanning
  • Facilities Rep-Alan Olson

Architecture_Review_Board_Charge

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *